CIRCUMCISION RITE AND THE RIGHT TO SAY THE PLEDGE
In the six circuit court of appeal
Basil Marceaux. The "friend of the court"The moving partyamicus curiae to: case # 1:12-cv-190 judge Mattice
Hamilton County Commissioners and the County Attorney
The moving party Ask for a leave of this court for the moving party to play the role of an amicus curiae to adherence to Christianity in the plaintiff appeal of U.S. court order:1. As the one of the highest oath citizen in our nation and you can see me at most military national park as a statue of the best a marine and if I understand the international role of an amicus curiae is, as stated by Salmon LJ in Allen v Sir Alfred McAlpine & Sons Ltd  2 QB 229 at p. 266 F-G that the role of an amicus curiae was to help the court by expounding the law impartially, or if one of the parties were unrepresented, by advancing the legal arguments on his behalf.
The situation in prominent cases of amici curiae are generally organizations with sizable legal budgets people think me godly! s . At this time this amici curiae party is not a direct party to a case, like everyone else would be ,either for it not for it ,who volunteers to offer information to assist the court in deciding “god place” before it. The information provided may be a legal opinion in the form of this brief and, a testimony that has not been solicited by any of the parties on a matter that bears on the case.and in any other court.
But by believing in god it could make one a indirect party but wait a minute my family was religious with religious sacrifice like circumcision rite at birth marking a boy's entrance into life. Circumcision is: Male circumcision is the surgical removal of the foreskin (prepuce) from the penis. It is estimated that one-third of males worldwide are circumcised. It is most prevalent in the Muslim world (where it is near-universal), parts of Southeast Asia, Africa, the United States and Oceania; it is relatively rare in Europe, Latin America, parts of Southern Africa, and most of Asia. The origin of circumcision is not known with certainty; the oldest documentary evidence for it comes from ancient Egypt. Various theories have been proposed as to how it began, including as a religious sacrifice and as a rite of passage marking a boy's entrance into adulthood. It is considered religious law in Judaism and established tradition in Islam to circumcise sons while it started in Plymouth Rock, Mass. in 1620- America)Most men are circumcised and has a religious connection.
In this Christian faith of Jesus not having prayer in the commission building is like the idea the man can married men which is being miss used ,married were here since the pilgrims where Edward Winslow and Susanna White, each of whom lost their spouses during the harsh winter of 1620–1621, became the first couple to be married in Plymouth( (America). Governor Bradford presided over the civil ceremony. Marriage was considered the normal state for all adult residents of the colony. Within the confines of marriage, women and men
Formal laws were not codified until 1636. The colony's laws were based on a hybrid of English common law and religious law as laid out in the Bible. Still, some means of governance was needed; the Mayflower Compact, signed by the 41 able-bodied men aboard the Mayflower upon their arrival in Provincetown Harbor on November 21, 1620, was the colony's first governing document.the Mayflower Compact that started with a prayer
“In the name of God, Amen. We, whose names are under written, the loyal subjects of our dread Sovereign Lord King James, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, defender of the Faith, etc.
Having undertaken, for the Glory of God, and advancements of the Christian faith and honor of our King and Country, a voyage to plant the first colony in the Northern parts of Virginia, do by these presents, solemnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil body politic; for our better ordering, and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by virtue hereof to enact, constitute, and frame, such just and equal laws, ordinances, acts, constitutions, and offices, from time to time, as shall be thought most meet and convenient for the general good of the colony; unto which we promise all due submission and obedience.”
Finally, As an amici curiae party historian and a protect an defend soldier at the park ask the leave of the court to let my thoughts concerning why Jesus must be on the lips of citizens who believe in him and the main job of a Christian is to get more people at the table where Moses in heaven.
The Jeffersonian distinction between Church and State is very different from the idea promoted in our day. The very phrase “separation of Church and State” is very misleading. It is not a constitutional phrase but it came afterward in the writings of Jefferson. It originated as a Calvinist/Puritan distinction between the spheres of authority of church and civil government. The Church and the State are separate spheres of governmental authority. Separation of Church and State does not mean separation of the civil sphere from God. The issue is not whether the Church should intrude on the State’s affairs. The Church should not. Neither should the State intrude on the Church’s affairs. But Jesus Christ intercedes in the affairs of both. Civil government is not secular; it still stands under the moral Law of God. This was the understanding of most American legislators until the 20th century.
In all past rulings concerning Jesus did not use any of this information or this amicus curiae party say the government allows tax exempt hate group to be formed and too get free money ,to get hate group members to take this amicus curiae party rights to hear the government people or any clubs ,citizens to pray to god and Jesus .
This amicus curiae party is a real life entity, these tax exempt hate groups are corporations and are not. Being these tax exempt were created by the government and the government are defendants this is government telling the citizens where to pray and the uses of decisions must be mooted
So one of the real question to be answered is: When did religious freedom first start in America?
We had religious freedom under England!
The constitution did not needs to define religious freedom only to make sure it stays in place as long as time.
Was government in America in 1620 influence by people who believed in Jesus while doing their governmental duties?
As an amici curiae party historian and a protect an defend soldier at the park ask for leave ask you not to let plaintiff to block anything!
MOTION TO COMPEL
In the Tennessee Criminal Court of appeal in Knoxville
V Doc:---34056--------------------------- Hamilton county criminal court Basil Marceaux Judge Stern ombudsman
Motion to Compel
Comes the moving party to this court with an motion to Compel orders:They are not listening in this case when you said cities are civil must go to circuit Court. Cities only can do ordinates no state crimes.
1. e2010-01497-cca-ot-co 2.e2011- 02643-cca-r10-co ,- 3. e2012-00271-cca-wrm-wm and To Compel Tn .Supreme Decisions as used in above orders City are civil must go to circuit Court can only do ordinates, no state crimes right to jury trial, fifty dollar fine, if court cost must be actual cost 1. Chattanooga v davis ruling 54s.w. 3d 248, 259 tenn. 2001 2. City of Chattanooga v myers 787 s.w. 2d 921, 922 ten Things that must be compel because old policies will not work in a civil city
1. Cities have too change there charters to civil and not criminal after myers 2. An attorney general can not be seated at his position during a civil trial the city attorney must be there 3. A sheriff of a County can not come into civil city limit that is civil and arrest anyone for a state crimes
4. Criminal case from a civil city limit can not be heard in a session court
5. Must let people out of jail and/or sponge all records
6. City criminal police must be cities process servers
Basil Marceaux I Pro se'810 Hyatte Rd. Soddy Daisy, Tn. 37379 ph. 423-362-0088
oral arguement requsted All party served by mail an exact copy